Eddie Abbew claims calorie deficit should not be the main concern with fat loss. What does the data say?
Coral Red: Mostly False
Orange: Misleading
Yellow: Mostly True
Green: True
On December 7th, fitness influencer Eddie Abbew claimed on Instagram that fat loss is determined by hormone regulation, particularly insulin, rather than calorie counting. “It’s not calories that you need to count. You need to control insulin by changing your food choices. Stop yo-yo dieting and change your lifestyle.”
As losing weight is often among the top New Year’s resolutions, social media is full of ‘hacks’ or promises at this time of year, and it can be difficult to differentiate between sound advice and exaggerated claims. This article will fact-check the claim that insulin regulation is what really matters for fat loss against the balance of the available evidence.
While hormones like insulin play a role in weight management, calorie intake remains a fundamental factor in fat loss. The post leans on an oversimplification which is regularly used on social media to promote specific dietary approaches.
This claim uses language that suggests that what you know about fat loss is wrong — a tactic often used to grab attention and build distrust in established advice. When making dietary changes, seek information from health professionals or experts in the fields of nutrition and weight management, to help you achieve your goals safely and effectively.
Phrases like 'It’s not this, it’s that' are common on social media and are designed to grab attention by oversimplifying complex topics. However, science is rarely so black-and-white.
The Traffic Lights Decoder
With posts like these, some social media users will argue that Eddie Abbew’s aim is essentially to get people to eat fewer ultra-processed foods and to focus on nutrient-dense foods instead. The implication is that addressing this type of content is therefore unnecessary, as in the grand scheme of things, moving away from ultra-processed foods is positive, especially in the context of weight loss or weight management.
In this article, we will use our Traffic Lights Decoder (you can read more about it here), to show how nutrition misinformation works and why addressing misleading claims matters. Although the main point of a post might be well-intentioned, this traffic lights decoder aims at uncovering the many layers within a claim to discuss its impact on the public. GREEN refers to accurate, generally accepted information; ORANGE refers to information that can be misleading, usually due to oversimplification. Finally, RED is for information which has the potential to be harmful in certain contexts.
Green (Accurate): Hormones Matter
The role of Insulin
Eddie Abbew’s statement highlights the role of hormones, specifically insulin, in fat loss. Insulin is indeed a key hormone that regulates blood sugar and influences fat storage, particularly after consuming carbohydrates.
“After food is digested, glucose is released into the bloodstream. In response, the pancreas secretes insulin, which directs the muscle and fat cells to take in glucose. Cells obtain energy from glucose or convert it to fat for long-term storage.” (NIH News Release)
The Carbohydrate-Insulin Model
The carbohydrate-insulin model suggests that high-carbohydrate diets cause spikes in insulin, which promotes fat storage and reduces fat burning, leading to weight gain and difficulty losing weight. However, research shows that losing weight on a high carbohydrate diet is indeed possible, which seems to contradict the carbohydrate-insulin model.
In this controlled trial (Hall et al., 2016), seventeen overweight or obese men consumed a high-carbohydrate diet for four weeks, followed by an isocaloric ketogenic (low carb) diet for four weeks. Researchers found that the isocaloric ketogenic diet was not accompanied by increased body fat loss.
In another study looking at the long-term effects of low-carbohydrate diets compared with low-fat diets, researchers concluded that “both dietary patterns resulted in similar weight loss and changes in body composition.” The authors added that “the low-carbohydrate diet may offer clinical benefits to obese persons with insulin resistance,” but also cautioned against the increase of LDL cholesterol when following this diet. (Brinkworth et al., 2009)
What we begin to see here is that while insulin does matter, it does not mean that the principle of energy balance is irrelevant.
"Losing body weight and body fat is not a simple, linear process but that does not mean anyone trying to do so has a problem with their hormones. Endocrine disorders are medical conditions that require medical intervention and their symptoms go beyond finding fat loss difficult. Insulin is an essential hormone for human health which is carefully regulated by our endocrine system. Losing body fat is not dependent on insulin alone and it is well-established that adiposity is multifactorial, as is fat loss. Yo-yo dieting is not a recommended way to lose weight in a sustainable or healthy way but this statement does not give any practical or actionable advice on how to make healthy, sustainable dietary changes."
Orange (Misleading): Calorie counting does not work.
Fact-Check: Calories also matter
The assertion that “it’s not calories you need to count” creates a misleading binary. While insulin is a factor in fat storage, the principle of energy balance (sometimes known as ‘calories in, calories out’) remains fundamental to weight loss. A calorie deficit—burning more energy than consumed—is a well-documented requirement for fat loss across diverse populations. For instance, a Randomized Controlled Trial (Sacks et al., 2009) compared diets with varying compositions of fat, protein, and carbohydrates and found that calorie intake, rather than macronutrient composition, was the primary determinant of weight loss. This reinforces the idea that calorie intake, alongside the quality of food choices, plays a critical role in sustainable fat loss.
Experts who criticize the concept of calorie counting often refer to the fact that ‘a calorie isn’t a calorie,’ emphasizing the importance of diet quality rather than entirely dismissing the concept of energy balance.
Framing the issue as “not calories but insulin” excludes the broader context of weight management and can oversimplify complex physiological processes. This “one-factor” explanation often aligns with marketing strategies promoting specific diets or solutions.
However, Eddie Abbew is right in his focus on sustainable weight loss. Indeed studies suggest that a variety of diets can be conducive to weight loss. What seems to make the difference is whether the changes made are sustainable for the individual, or not. In other words, weight loss is most effective when it is thought of as a lifestyle change rather than a temporary episode with clear start and end points. In that sense, yo-yo dieting is indeed not recommended by health professionals. Repeated cycles of weight loss and regain can also disrupt metabolism, hunger hormones (like ghrelin and leptin), and mental well-being. But the key also does not lie with one specific diet.
Red (Potentially Harmful): Distrust in Evidence-Based Health Advice
The claim risks reinforcing skepticism toward established medical and nutritional guidance, as it contributes to the broader narrative that “everything you know about fat loss is wrong.” Framing insulin as the sole factor in weight loss risks overshadowing the importance of evidence-based strategies that consider calorie intake, diet quality, and sustainable habits. This type of claim can encourage distrust in established nutritional guidance and lead individuals to overlook balanced, long-term approaches for weight management.
It is critical to highlight that weight loss is challenging and highly individualised. Simplistic “hacks” or focusing on a single factor can divert attention from evidence-based strategies, such as adopting a well-balanced, nutrient-dense diet and regular physical activity.
Conclusion
Weight loss and fat management are multifaceted processes involving hormones, calorie intake, and lifestyle habits. While insulin management is vital for those with insulin resistance or related conditions, no single factor dominates the equation. Sustainable weight loss comes from addressing a combination of dietary quality, energy balance, regular activity, and long-term habits. Framing weight loss as solely about insulin may oversimplify the issue and mislead individuals seeking effective strategies. Always consult reputable sources or professionals for personalised guidance and continued support.
We have contacted Eddie Abbew and are awaiting a response.
Disclaimer
This article is intended to provide evidence-based information and should not replace professional medical advice. For personalized guidance on weight management, consult a registered dietitian, nutritionist, or healthcare provider.
📚 Sources
NIH News Releases (2010). “NIH study shows insulin stimulates fat cells to take in glucose.” https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/nih-study-shows-how-insulin-stimulates-fat-cells-take-glucose#:~:text=After%20food%20is%20digested,%20glucose,fat%20for%20long-term%20storage
Ludwig, D.S. & Ebbeling, C.B. (2019). “The Carbohydrate-Insulin Model of Obesity: Beyond ‘Calories In, Calories Out’.” https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6082688/
Hall, K.D. et al. (2016). “Energy expenditure and body composition changes after an isocaloric ketogenic diet in overweight and obese men.” https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4962163/
Brinkworth, G.D. et al. (2009). “Long-term effects of a very-low-carbohydrate weight loss diet compared with an isocaloric low-fat diet after 12 mo.” https://ajcn.nutrition.org/article/S0002-9165(23)23206-2/fulltext
Sacks, F.M. et al. (2009). “Comparison of weight-loss diets with different compositions of fat, protein, and carbohydrates.” https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19246357/
Spreckley et al. (2021). “Perspectives into the experience of successful, substantial long-term weight-loss maintenance: a systematic review.” https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17482631.2020.1862481#d1e169
Foodfacts.org is an independent non-profit fact-checking platform dedicated to exposing misinformation in the food industry. We provide transparent, science-based insights on nutrition, health, and environmental impacts, empowering consumers to make informed choices for a healthier society and planet.
Help us fight false information.
Help us debunk false claims and provide consumers with the truth about the food system. Your support allows us to continue our vital work in fact-checking and advocating for transparency. Together, we can make a real difference.
Was this article helpful?