Methane in the Food System: A Hidden Driver of Climate Change and What We Can Do About It
Coral Red: Mostly False
Orange: Misleading
Yellow: Mostly True
Green: True
A Simple Intro to the Role of Methane in the Food System
Methane (CH4) is one of the most potent greenhouse gases driving climate change today. While methane emissions don’t last as long in the atmosphere as carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane is up to 28 times more effective at trapping heat over a 100-year period, with its warming impact even more intense in the first 20 years. This short-lived but potent effect makes methane reduction a top priority for near-term climate action, especially given the urgency of our current climate crisis. Reducing methane emissions can provide rapid benefits, slowing warming in the near term and buying critical time to address longer-lasting greenhouse gases like CO₂. Understanding methane’s sources and impacts, especially in the food system, can pave the way for effective solutions and immediate benefits to the global climate.
Methane Emissions from Animal Agriculture
The food system is a significant source of methane emissions, with animal agriculture as a primary contributor. Methane is generated through enteric fermentation (a digestive process in ruminant animals such as cows) and manure management. Together, these agricultural sources contribute approximately 30% of global methane emissions, with cattle production leading the charge. As environmental advocate George Monbiot puts it, "Livestock farming is the world’s greatest source of methane from human activities."
Monbiot emphasized that, without reducing methane emissions from livestock, climate targets will be exceedingly difficult to reach. Nicholas Carter, another environmental advocate, highlights methane reduction as one of the most cost-effective climate solutions available today. Carter argues that reducing methane offers rapid benefits, making it a crucial component of the climate solution puzzle.
The Role of Food Waste in Methane Emissions
Food waste is a significant source of methane emissions, especially when it decomposes anaerobically (without oxygen) in landfills. Decomposing food waste releases large amounts of methane, contributing to the climate impact of the food waste crisis. By reducing food waste, we can prevent methane emissions, conserve resources, and reduce pressure on landfill sites.
Practical solutions for reducing food waste and methane generation include composting and planning meals effectively. Composting, which breaks down food waste aerobically, prevents methane emissions by keeping organic waste out of oxygen-deprived landfill environments.
Textile Waste and Methane Production
Textile waste is often overlooked, yet it contributes to methane emissions when organic fibers like cotton and wool decompose in landfills. The rise of fast fashion and high clothing turnover increases textile waste, exacerbating methane emissions. Encouraging sustainable practices, such as donating or repurposing old clothes, can help reduce this methane-generating waste. Opting for sustainable brands and materials can also limit methane contributions from textile waste, an area often overshadowed in methane discussions.
Solutions and Policy Efforts to Reduce Methane Emissions
Several global initiatives and policy efforts aim to curb methane emissions across sectors, especially in agriculture. The Global Methane Pledge is one such collaborative effort focusing on reducing methane emissions worldwide. Swapping livestock feed or giving supplements has shown, in niche experiments, to potentially lower methane. Many are debunking the exaggerated claims around things like seaweed fed to cows, and showing it's a greenwashing delay tactic. Instead focus on what would bring multiple times more reductions in livestock methane: strategically reduce the vast number of them farmed in the first place. Additionally, innovative sustainable rice farming techniques are being developed to reduce methane emissions from rice paddies, another significant source of methane.
Other industry efforts are underway to change how methane is measured, risking allowing the biggest polluters to be rewarded for minor decreases. Nicholas Carter’s methane report warns that adjusting methane measurements could obscure the real impact of large-scale polluters, making it appear as if meaningful progress is being made when, in fact, emissions remain dangerously high.
Monbiot asserts that governments should address agricultural methane more rigorously. Unfortunately, according to Monbiot, the livestock industry’s influence has stifled efforts to curb methane emissions from animal agriculture. Monbiot calls for a global shift away from livestock products to achieve real progress in climate goals, advocating for climate-conscious diets and policies that prioritize methane reduction.
Taking Action: Small Steps, Big Impact on Methane Reduction
Reducing methane emissions within the food system offers an opportunity for fast, impactful climate action. From minimizing food and textile waste to adopting climate-friendly diets and supporting methane-focused policies, consumer actions complement policy and industry efforts in a meaningful way. A collective approach—combining policy, innovation, and individual action—can significantly reduce methane emissions, leading to measurable benefits for the planet’s climate.
Sources
Bunge, A.C. et al. (2024). Sustainability benefits of transitioning from current diets to plant-based alternatives or whole-food diets in Sweden.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-45328-6
Chen, J.C. et al. (2024). Stable isotope chemistry reveals plant-dominant diet among early foragers on the Andean Altiplano, 9.0–6.5 cal. ka.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0296420
Farvid, M.S. et al. (2021). Consumption of red meat and processed meat and cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-021-00741-9
Ritchie, H. (2021). Drivers of Deforestation.
https://ourworldindata.org/drivers-of-deforestation
Shang, X. et al. (2017). Dietary protein from different food sources, incident metabolic syndrome and changes in its components: An 11-year longitudinal study in healthy community-dwelling adults.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S026156141631264X
The Guardian (2024). Hunter-gatherers were mostly gatherers, says archaeologist.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/jan/24/hunter-gatherers-were-mostly-gatherers-says-archaeologist
Tufts Now (2024). Diets Rich in Plant Protein May Help Women Stay Healthy as They Age.
https://now.tufts.edu/2024/01/17/diets-rich-plant-protein-may-help-women-stay-healthy-they-age
University of Oxford Medical Sciences Division (2023). Vegan diet has just 30% of the environmental impact of a high-meat diet, major study finds.
https://www.medsci.ox.ac.uk/news/vegan-diet-has-just-30-of-the-environmental-impact-of-a-high-meat-diet-major-study-finds
University of Oxford (2021). Red and processed meat linked to increased risk of heart disease, Oxford study shows.
https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2021-07-21-red-and-processed-meat-linked-increased-risk-heart-disease-oxford-study-shows
WWF. Soy.
https://wwf.panda.org/discover/our_focus/food_practice/sustainable_production/soy/
Zhong, V.W. et al. (2020). Associations of Processed Meat, Unprocessed Red Meat, Poultry, or Fish Intake With Incident Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2759737
Foodfacts.org is an independent non-profit fact-checking platform dedicated to exposing misinformation in the food industry. We provide transparent, science-based insights on nutrition, health, and environmental impacts, empowering consumers to make informed choices for a healthier society and planet.
Help us fight false information.
Help us debunk false claims and provide consumers with the truth about the food system. Your support allows us to continue our vital work in fact-checking and advocating for transparency. Together, we can make a real difference.
Was this article helpful?